Stephanie's group:
As a group we decided to give Stephanie's group a low/mid level 3 for the video. We believe that the group gave evidence of a more than basic level of ability, and a fairly proficient attempt. The shots were well framed, appropriate distance from the characters, held steady and the audio was clear throughout. The downfall to their work was we felt that the non-diegetic music did not flow as well as it could; if the group were allowed more time, I think that the music would be more appropriate and parallel to the action. For audio, I think that a level 2/3 is appropriate as they showed proficiency, and the dialogue was clearly recorded.
Luke's group:
We decided to give Luke's group a level 2; the shots that it consisted of were appropriate for the action and steadily shot, however the overall product was unfinished, and the dialogue seemed extremely rushed. The group followed the majority of the guidelines given, although they failed to show the character exiting the room.
Tom's group:
We gave Tom's group a level 3, they showed more than a basic attempt, and we felt it was proficient. The non-diegetic sound of the text tone and the music fit in extremely well with their video, and the shots were steady throughout. A slight continuity error was visible at the end, as Callum's arms were behind his head, and in the next shot they on the table, however this was fairly unnoticeable. To improve their video they could have used a larger variety of shots, however other than that it was well presented. The dialogue was slightly unclear, so for that we gave them a high level 2.
As a group we decided to give Stephanie's group a low/mid level 3 for the video. We believe that the group gave evidence of a more than basic level of ability, and a fairly proficient attempt. The shots were well framed, appropriate distance from the characters, held steady and the audio was clear throughout. The downfall to their work was we felt that the non-diegetic music did not flow as well as it could; if the group were allowed more time, I think that the music would be more appropriate and parallel to the action. For audio, I think that a level 2/3 is appropriate as they showed proficiency, and the dialogue was clearly recorded.
Luke's group:
We decided to give Luke's group a level 2; the shots that it consisted of were appropriate for the action and steadily shot, however the overall product was unfinished, and the dialogue seemed extremely rushed. The group followed the majority of the guidelines given, although they failed to show the character exiting the room.
Tom's group:
We gave Tom's group a level 3, they showed more than a basic attempt, and we felt it was proficient. The non-diegetic sound of the text tone and the music fit in extremely well with their video, and the shots were steady throughout. A slight continuity error was visible at the end, as Callum's arms were behind his head, and in the next shot they on the table, however this was fairly unnoticeable. To improve their video they could have used a larger variety of shots, however other than that it was well presented. The dialogue was slightly unclear, so for that we gave them a high level 2.
No comments:
Post a Comment